It looks as if Lord Rama will get the possession of his birth place by November this year. All the Hindu parties arguing in favour of Lord Rama have completed their argument in the Supreme Court.
The lawyers representing the deity Ram Lalla, Nirmohi Akhara, All India Ram Janmashtan Punaruthan Samiti and others in favour of Lord Rama have argued in the Supreme Court that the disputed structure have pictures of Hindu Gods and have temple bells so it cannot be a mosque. Also the Babri Masjid was built on a land which was not given either to Babur or Mir Baqi. And as per Islamic law a mosque cannot be built on such a land which did not belong to Muslims. Moreover, Hindus have been worshipping there for centuries. Shia Waqf Board too has supported the claims of the Hindu parties.
Allahabad High Court had earlier divided the 2.77-acre disputed land of Ram Janmabhoomi – Babri Masjid in Ayodhya equally among the three litigants. One third of the disputed land was given to the deity Ram Lalla, one third comprising Ram Chabutra and Sita Rasaoi went to Nirmohi Akhara and last one third was given to Sunni Waqf Board. But the verdict was challenged in the supreme.
A five – judge constitution bench of Supreme Court led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi is currently hearing the religious sensitive case 5 days a week since August 6.
Now the senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan representing Sunni Waqf Board is only left to complete his arguments. Dhavan had earlier informed the court that he will take 20 days to complete his argument.
As per a report in Times of India CJI Ranjan Gogoi will retire on November 17. But after the argument of Rajeev Dhavan SC will have enough time to give the verdict before CJI retires.
